Subject: [xsl] text() From: "Birnbaum, David J" <djbpitt@xxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 23:05:19 -0400 |
Dear XSLT List, I'm almost afraid to enter this discussion because it has wandered off in non-productive and sometimes embarrassing directions, but I'll take a chance and hope that I can say something constructive and useful and that any responses (not that any are required or expected) will stay on target: What I found confusing about text() when I first began learning XPath is that it ends with a pair of parentheses, like string(), which led me to the erroneous assumption that it was a function, like string(), and not a node test, like *. That's not a complaint about XPath syntax or even an inquiry about why things are the way they are. It's just an observation that in a world where many things that end in a pair of parentheses are functions, it perhaps shouldn't be surprising that beginners overgeneralize and assume, incorrectly, that parentheses imply a function and that text(), therefore, is a function that says "give me all of the textual content (that is, the string value) of something." Best, David
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Managing debug logging in, Tony Graham | Thread | Re: [xsl] text(), Wendell Piez |
Re: [xsl] XSLT Hello World, Ihe Onwuka | Date | Re: [xsl] Managing debug logging in, George Cristian Bina |
Month |