Subject: Re: [xsl] Map functions in XSLT 3.0 static expressions? From: "Abel Braaksma (Exselt)" <abel@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 19:37:53 +0100 |
On 25-3-2014 17:31, Tony Graham wrote: > On Tue, March 25, 2014 4:10 pm, Abel Braaksma (Exselt) wrote: >> I would suggest you to raise a bug against the specification for this >> particular instance of the use of the term core functions. >> >> Oh wait, it is already there, I raised it recently in bug #24970: >> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24970. But it is not >> explicit to your specific case. I will add it to that bug. > Thanks. An earlier search on 'static expression' [1] hadn't turned up > anything, but I'd asked the question here rather than raising a bug just > in case there was anything that I'd missed. > I added a comment to the respective, public bug report [1]. I think it covers your issue, if not, feel free to comment in that same thread. Note that currently, internally we already updated the definition of "core functions" to include map and math functions, which only leaves us to a small editorial issue in the section you spoke of. Cheers, Abel Braaksma Exselt XSLT 3.0 processor http://exselt.net [1] https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24970#c2
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Map functions in XSLT 3.0, Tony Graham | Thread | [xsl] discoverable design, was RE: , Michael Sokolov |
AW: [xsl] comparing attributes if m, Szabo, Patrick (LNG- | Date | Re: [xsl] Managing debug logging in, Liam R E Quin |
Month |