Subject: Re: [xsl] Things that make you go Hmmmm! From: Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 16:21:40 +0000 |
My first reaction was why is this a premium feature (it is until 3.0 reaches the cheap seats). My subsequent reaction is surprise the content models ever differed in the first place. On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 7:20 AM, Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 27 Mar 2014, at 01:40, Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> The select clause on xsl:copy requires XSLT 3.0 - it didn't matter in >> my case as I was only copying an attribute and got the same effect >> with copy-of. >> >> The content models for the respective commands are otherwise >> symmetrical. Why the sudden departure? >> > > Do you mean, why was the select attribute added to xsl:copy in XSLT 3.0? > > You can find the rationale here: > > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6848 > > Michael Kay > Saxonica
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Things that make you go H, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] Things that make you go H, Abel Braaksma (Exsel |
Re: [xsl] Select name of XSD target, Abel Braaksma (Exsel | Date | Re: [xsl] Returning item type of va, Dimitre Novatchev |
Month |