Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: Position() in apply-templates From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 19:10:58 -0700 |
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > So, the answer about B) is that its position() is "the number assigned > to that node" but from the outer <xsl:apply-templates> :) What I said applies to the current case, but generally, the answer about B) is that its position() is the position of the (current) context node (this might be part of the focus set inside an <xsl:for-each> too). -- Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev --------------------------------------- Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence. --------------------------------------- To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk ------------------------------------- Never fight an inanimate object ------------------------------------- To avoid situations in which you might make mistakes may be the biggest mistake of all ------------------------------------ Quality means doing it right when no one is looking. ------------------------------------- You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what you're doing is work or play ------------------------------------- To achieve the impossible dream, try going to sleep. ------------------------------------- Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. ------------------------------------- Typing monkeys will write all Shakespeare's works in 200yrs.Will they write all patents, too? :) ------------------------------------- I finally figured out the only reason to be alive is to enjoy it.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Re: Position() in apply-t, Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | Re: [xsl] Re: Position() in apply-t, Wendell Piez |
Re: [xsl] Re: Position() in apply-t, Dimitre Novatchev | Date | [xsl] Numeric top-level predicates , Abel Braaksma (Exsel |
Month |