Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: backticks in regex - tales of the unexpected part II From: Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 17:35:44 +0100 |
Just going by the definition of the \w class in MK's XPath 2.0 reference - \w -> a character considered to form part of a word So it's TS if backtick isn't a word character in your vocabulary. Probably neither the first or the last to get caught by that one. On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 5:21 PM, David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 07/04/2014 17:09, Ihe Onwuka wrote: >> >> to put that another way why is a backtick (matches \w) deemed more >> wordy than a quote which doesn't match \w. > > > > You cross posted to the wrong lists really, regex syntax is as defined > by schema, not by xsl or xquery, and that defines \w as > > [#x0000-#x10FFFF]-[\p{P}\p{Z}\p{C}] (all characters except the set of > "punctuation", "separator" and "other" characters) > > > By backtick I assume you mean U+0060 [`] which isn't a quotation mark, > it's a grave accent and has unicode class Sk so isn't punctuation, > separator or other. (Sk is "symbols") > > David
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Re: backticks in regex - , David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] Re: backticks in regex - , David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] Re: backticks in regex - , David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] Re: backticks in regex - , David Carlisle |
Month |