Re: [xsl] RM: RFC: Instrinsically-defined maps?

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home

Re: [xsl] RM: RFC: Instrinsically-defined maps?

Subject: Re: [xsl] RM: RFC: Instrinsically-defined maps?
From: Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 15:06:53 +0100

> It would be nice to be able to have the features of all 3 in a single
> type.... in other words a memo-function whose stored keys you could
> retrieve.

Doesn't this make the result dependent on order of execution?

Given the expression

f(1), f(2), keys(f#1), f(3), f(4)

are you expecting that keys(f#1) will return (1,2)? If so, that's certainly
non-deterministic.

Michael Kay
Saxonica

Current Thread
[xsl] RM: RFC: Instrinsically-defined maps? David Rudel - 16 Apr 2014 09:52:00 -0000 Dimitre Novatchev - 16 Apr 2014 13:54:27 -0000 Michael Kay - 16 Apr 2014 14:07:05 -0000 <= David Rudel - 16 Apr 2014 14:43:57 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] RM: RFC: Instrinsically-d, Dimitre Novatchev	Thread	Re: [xsl] RM: RFC: Instrinsically-d, David Rudel
Re: [xsl] RM: RFC: Instrinsically-d, Dimitre Novatchev	Date	Re: [xsl] RM: RFC: Instrinsically-d, David Rudel
	Month