Subject: Re: [xsl] Approach to transform 250GB xml data From: "Michael Kay mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 11:46:21 -0000 |
Sorry, for some reason your message arrived before the OP's response so I read it without context. Michael Kay Saxonica mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx +44 (0) 118 946 5893 On 10 Sep 2014, at 12:35, Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.laun@xxxxxxxxx <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > My quip was meant to urge OP to forward a more accurate description of the requirement - "not sorting" isn't very positive. > -W > > On 10 September 2014 13:21, Michael Kay mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 10 Sep 2014, at 11:59, Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.laun@xxxxxxxxx <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > "Sorting" is just one particular case of "changing the structure". > > > > Yes, but it's not true that all structural changes are non-streamable. For example, order-preserving grouping and flattening operations, and many aggregation operations, are streamable. > > I simply chose sorting as a concrete example of something that was self-evidently non-streamable. Of course it was only an example. > > Michael Kay > Saxonica > > > XSL-List info and archive > EasyUnsubscribe (by email)
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Approach to transform 250, Wolfgang Laun wolfga | Thread | Re: [xsl] Approach to transform 250, Liam R E Quin liam@x |
Re: [xsl] Approach to transform 250, Wolfgang Laun wolfga | Date | Re: [xsl] Approach to transform 250, Hank Ratzesberger xm |
Month |