Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Web Components From: "Ihe Onwuka ihe.onwuka@xxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 19:28:15 -0000 |
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 8:14 PM, Michael Kay mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx < xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Well, one that I worked with was ICL QuickBuild, which was used by a few > hundred mainframe users in the UK for generating transaction processing > applications (some of them massive applications). > I remember it although I never understood it. There was also ApplicationMaster... didn't understand that either. > It actually had many XSLT-like characteristics (which is what attracted me > to XSLT when I first encountered it). > Hah if only I knew then what I know now. > A program was a declarative description of an entire user session, with > all the management of session state taken care of behind the scenes. There > were quite a few such languages - most, like this one, tied to particular > hardware and software environments. Software AG's NATURAL is another > example. > I used to be an ADS/Online programmer - Cullinet Software IDMS database. > I don't think any 4GL had more than about 3% of the market, and that's > mainly what killed them - no standards, no critical mass. > > They were all proprietary and restricted to 1 hardware manufacturer. Then along came relational databases, open systems and PC's. > > > On 11 Sep 2014, at 16:55, Ihe Onwuka ihe.onwuka@xxxxxxxxx < > xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Michael Kay mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx < > xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >> >> I would like to think that the only thing that will lead to XSLT's >> decline is when someone invents something better, and there's no sign of >> that on the horizon. This might be wishful thinking, however; there were >> some excellent special-purpose languages in the 1980s that didn't survive >> because they didn't have a viable user and developer community, despite >> being ideally suited to their task >> > > Like for example? > > > > XSL-List info and archive <http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list> > EasyUnsubscribe <http://-list/293509> (by email) > > > XSL-List info and archive <http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list> > EasyUnsubscribe <-list/601651> (by > email <>)
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Web Components, Michael Kay mike@xxx | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Web Components, Ihe Onwuka ihe.onwuk |
Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Web Components, Michael Kay mike@xxx | Date | Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Web Components, Ihe Onwuka ihe.onwuk |
Month |