Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Web Components From: "Jirka Kosek jirka@xxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 23:20:04 -0000 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11.9.2014 16:46, Matthew L. Avizinis matt@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > 1) Do you think the web components concept will catch on widely? That's very likely. > 2) will they be supported by browser developers natively > eventually, do you suppose? Recent Chrome and Firefox already have native support. > finally, 3) do you think it will as a result have a major effect on > the use of xslt, resulting in it's decline? I don't see how Web Components could affect XSLT usage. Web Components will merely simplify client-side development by allowing to use declarative custom elements instead of bunch of imperative JS code. Jirka - -- - ------------------------------------------------------------------ Jirka Kosek e-mail: jirka@xxxxxxxx http://xmlguru.cz - ------------------------------------------------------------------ Professional XML consulting and training services DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing - ------------------------------------------------------------------ OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 rep. - ------------------------------------------------------------------ Bringing you XML Prague conference http://xmlprague.cz - ------------------------------------------------------------------ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32) iEYEARECAAYFAlQSLhEACgkQzwmSw7n0dR7V7QCeNv5yTGIIT7PKA4urx94nn8IM fKYAmwXMMTzk4793oJrsO58RsvfYG9W0 =JsON -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Web Components, Matthew L. Avizinis | Thread | [xsl] process xslt and xml spreadsh, rl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Web Components, Mark Giffin m1879@xx | Date | [xsl] process xslt and xml spreadsh, rl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Month |