Subject: Re: [xsl] xsl:for-each-group using multiple threads? From: "Marc Kupietz kupietz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 20:22:37 -0000 |
Thanks, Michael and David for the quick replies! I already had the suspicion that if it was be so easily transferrable from xsl:for-each, in a proper way it would probably be done, already. David's map+stream approach brought be to an even easier solution for my problem: As it mainly concerns the 2nd stage of a 2-stage conversion I can easily produce several "grouped" result-documents (maybe named pipes) in the first stage and process them in parallel and using streaming in the second stage. This way I can use adjustable package sizes and all cores without running out of memory and hopefully end-up with i/o as bottleneck :) Marc
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] xsl:for-each-group using , Michael Kay mike@xxx | Thread | Re: [xsl] xsl:for-each-group using , David Rudel fwqhgads |
Re: [xsl] xsl:for-each-group using , David Rudel fwqhgads | Date | [xsl] minified json output, Rushforth, Peter pet |
Month |