Subject: Re: [xsl] Does XSLT 3 need an instruction for creating functions? From: "Michael Kay mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 17:07:30 -0000 |
Yes, this would sometimes be nice, but we decided not to do it. Therebs always a way of rewriting it either to use XPath inline functions or to use XSLT named functions, even in cases where you need local variables in the function closure. Michael Kay Saxonica > On 14 Oct 2015, at 17:21, Max Toro maxtoroq@xxxxxxxxx <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I know you have anonymous functions in XPath 3.0, but you cannot use > instructions in them, you'd have to put them in an `xsl:function`, and > by then all the fun is gone. Something like this (nevermind the name): > > <xsl:variable name="myFn"> > <xsl:delegate> > <xsl:param name="a"/> > > <xsl:call-template name="foo"/> > </xsl:delegate> > </xsl:variable> > > <xsl:sequence select="$myFn(5)"/> > -- > Max Toro
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Does XSLT 3 need an instructi, Max Toro maxtoroq@xx | Thread | [xsl] Processing 2 files and using , dvint@xxxxxxxxx |
[xsl] Does XSLT 3 need an instructi, Max Toro maxtoroq@xx | Date | [xsl] Processing 2 files and using , dvint@xxxxxxxxx |
Month |