Subject: Re: [xsl] Odd Result-Document Behavior From: "Eliot Kimber ekimber@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 19:27:49 -0000 |
I9m pleased that I found a bug, sorry that9s it there. Cheers, E. ---- Eliot Kimber, Owner Contrext, LLC http://contrext.com On 12/23/15, 1:19 PM, "Michael Kay mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> It seems unlikely that this is a Saxon bug > >Guessing probabilities never got anyone anywhere ;-) > >The code looks something like this: > >if (getFormatExpression() != null) { > ... > // TODO: reinstate > >// a chunk of commented out code > >I'm never sure when something like this happens whether it means that >no-one uses the feature, or that no-one reports the bug when they find it >doesn't work. But it certainly means that there aren't any tests for it. > >Logged as a bug at https://saxonica.plan.io/issues/2559. Affects both 9.6 >and 9.7. > >The old 9.5 implementation will no longer work because of the >introduction of packages: xsl:output declarations are scoped to a package >in 3.0, so the code has to search for an xsl:output declaration of the >right name, but only in the package that contains the xsl:result-document >instruction. > >Michael Kay >Saxonica
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Odd Result-Document Behav, Michael Kay mike@xxx | Thread | [xsl] What is the appropriate XPath, Costello, Roger L. c |
Re: [xsl] Odd Result-Document Behav, Michael Kay mike@xxx | Date | [xsl] What is the appropriate XPath, Costello, Roger L. c |
Month |