Re: [xsl] Function for determining one XPath as subset of another

Subject: Re: [xsl] Function for determining one XPath as subset of another
From: "Dimitre Novatchev dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 17:19:13 -0000
I don't expect this to be possible without knowing the two complete
evaluation contexts -- and of course, not only their static
components.

> My goal here is given any two simple arbitrary XPaths expressed as
> strings, and without evaluating them against a context, to determine
> whether one would return a subset of the results of the other.
>

Cheers,
Dimitre

On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 8:15 AM, Adam Retter
adam.retter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> Given two simple XPaths, say:
>
> 1. //w
>
> 2. /x/y/z/w[@a = 'v']
>
> As a human I can very easily tell without evaluating the expressions
> that (2) will return a subset (or the same set) of the results that
> (1) would return *should* they both be evaluated.
>
> My goal here is given any two simple arbitrary XPaths expressed as
> strings, and without evaluating them against a context, to determine
> whether one would return a subset of the results of the other.
>
> I wondered if there might be an algorithm or library that someone
> already had or has written which might be able to give me the answer?
>
> I realise that I can only probably cover a subset of XPath itself, but
> it is only the path steps with predicates which I am interested in.
>
> Ideally I am looking for something in Java.
>
> --
> Adam Retter
>
> skype: adam.retter
> tweet: adamretter
> http://www.adamretter.org.uk
> 



-- 
Cheers,
Dimitre Novatchev
---------------------------------------
Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.
---------------------------------------
To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk
-------------------------------------
Never fight an inanimate object
-------------------------------------
To avoid situations in which you might make mistakes may be the
biggest mistake of all
------------------------------------
Quality means doing it right when no one is looking.
-------------------------------------
You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what
you're doing is work or play
-------------------------------------
To achieve the impossible dream, try going to sleep.
-------------------------------------
Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.
-------------------------------------
Typing monkeys will write all Shakespeare's works in 200yrs.Will they
write all patents, too? :)
-------------------------------------
Sanity is madness put to good use.
-------------------------------------
I finally figured out the only reason to be alive is to enjoy it.

Current Thread