Subject: Re: [xsl] performance benefits of XSL3.0 From: "Mailing Lists Mail daktapaal@xxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 00:29:49 -0000 |
Thanks everyone for the suggestions.. @Mike, we are compiling the stylesheets and that is probably where my initial magnifying glass was too.. if there are ways to do something efficient than to compile the stylesheets, then i would like to know that too,. If saxon is officially supporting XSLT3.0, then I would like to start using it atleast in some areas( like replacing sax programs with XSLTs etc.. ) On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 5:27 PM, John Lumley john.lumley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 19 Apr 2016, at 20:37, Michael Kay mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> With any exercise looking at a possible course of action to improve performance, you need to start with measurements and targets. What is your current performance, how far does it fall short of requirements? > > With big data sources it can be worthwhile starting point to find how much time would be taken by a pure 'identity' transform.... one that merely repeatedly copies and applies templates... That will give you a sense of how much computation is going on.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] performance benefits of X, John Lumley john.lum | Thread | [xsl] A function that tokenizes a s, Costello, Roger L. c |
Re: [xsl] performance benefits of X, John Lumley john.lum | Date | [xsl] A function that tokenizes a s, Costello, Roger L. c |
Month |