Subject: Re: [xsl] is there a way to hash an element? From: "Graydon graydon@xxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 21:45:38 -0000 |
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 02:27:30PM -0000, Dimitre Novatchev dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx scripsit: > I would also try to use the standard XPath 2.0 function: > > deep-equal() > > Yes, it doesn't generate an id for identifying a sub-tree, but still > can be used for establishing classes of equivalence. > > Just a quick thought. Hi Dimitre -- deep-equal() works beautifully as a test but it doesn't provide a grouping mechanism. Going through n thousand structures pairwise just can't be optimal. -- Graydon, who wrote the initial very small test case using deep-equal()
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] is there a way to hash an, Dimitre Novatchev dn | Thread | Re: [xsl] is there a way to hash an, Liam R. E. Quin liam |
Re: [xsl] document-uri in MSXML, Mandar Jagtap jagman | Date | Re: [xsl] is there a way to hash an, Graydon graydon@xxxx |
Month |