Subject: [xsl] Tokenize followed by compare or satisfies using contains()? From: "Eliot Kimber ekimber@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 16:03:55 -0000 |
In the DITA processing code, where we are using XSLT 2 and checking for string matches in attribute values, I have the requirement to see if any of a number of strings might match. The current code is: some $c in $link-classes satisfies contains($node/@class, $c)) Where $link-classes is a sequence of strings and @class is a blank-delimited sequence of strings. Another way to do this check would be: $link-classes = tokenize($node/@class, ' ') This is a check that will be made a lot so performance may important (or it may not be). The tokenize version seems simpler and clearer to me but the satisfies approach has a certain elegance that I also like. My question: is there any reason to prefer one or the other of these? I realize that XSLT 3 provides a new way to do token matching in strings but for now we're stuff with XSLT 2. Cheers, Eliot -- Eliot Kimber http://contrext.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] XSL-List Guidelines, B Tommie Usdin btusd | Thread | Re: [xsl] Tokenize followed by comp, Michael Kay mike@xxx |
Re: [xsl] sequential numbering with, Heiko Niemann kontak | Date | Re: [xsl] Tokenize followed by comp, Michael Kay mike@xxx |
Month |