Subject: Re: [xsl] xsl:import From: "Dave Pawson dave.pawson@xxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2017 13:58:45 -0000 |
Thanks for the explanation. Agree re 'moving on', but the work in docbook is 'significant'. regards On 23 July 2017 at 14:50, Michael Kay mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 23 Jul 2017, at 14:43, Dave Pawson dave.pawson@xxxxxxxxx <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Mike - that really messes with docbook which are all 1.0 stylesheets. >> Is that the rec or your decision? Or a compat issue? >> > > It's our decision. It's time people switched to 2.0. It was probably Saxon-JS that pushed us that way - we really don't want extra code in the product to support a compatibility mode, when it's pretty easy to change your stylesheet to make it work "natively" under 2.0. > > If there's strong demand we could provide an option that says "I know this stylesheet says version="1.0" and that the spec says it should therefore either run in backwards compability mode or not at all, but actually I want you to run it as if it said version="2.0". > > Michael Kay > Saxonica > > -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] xsl:import, Michael Kay mike@xxx | Thread | Re: [xsl] xsl:import, Michael Kay mike@xxx |
Re: [xsl] xsl:import, Michael Kay mike@xxx | Date | Re: [xsl] Mode in XSLT 3.0, Toshihiko Makita tma |
Month |