Re: [xsl] Find the next item in a sequence

Subject: Re: [xsl] Find the next item in a sequence
From: "David Carlisle d.p.carlisle@xxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 3 May 2020 19:59:29 -0000
> position()+1 directly. Why can't I use position()+1 directly?

[...] with a numeric value is short for [position()=...]  so [
position()+1] is short for [position()=position()+1] which is not an error
but is always false.

David

Current Thread