Subject: RE: Copyright, for-profit educational institutions, and distance education From: Brandon Butler <brandon@xxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2012 18:10:34 -0800 |
All, Just to add a little to what's been said so far, I would think that the value of fair use in this context is hard to underestimate, and that (with the usual caveats about needing details) there is a strong likelihood that uses for online teaching would be fair, all else being equal. Why else is a teacher going to perform or display a work in the context of of an online course other than to comment, criticize, illustrate, etc.? Unless the class is bogus (not impossible given the lackluster reputation of for-profit institutions), there will likely be a good fair use story to tell. Principle One of the Code of Best Practices in Fair Use for Academic and Research Libraries speaks directly to this issue. You can read more about the Code here On the issue of "transformativeness," I think it's important to remember that courts don't use it in the colloquial sense. Judge Leval himself, who famously coined the phrase, defined it in this way: > I believe the answer to the question of justification turns primarily on whether, and to what extent, the challenged use is transformative. The use must be productive and must employ the quoted matter in a different manner or for a different purpose from the original. [FN29] A quotation of copyrighted material that merely repackages or republishes the original is unlikely to pass the test; in Justice Story's words, it would merely "supersede the objects" of the original. [FN30] If, on the other hand, the secondary use adds value to the original--if the quoted matter is used as raw material, transformed in the creation of new information, new aesthetics, new insights and understandings-- this is the very type of activity that the fair use doctrine intends to protect for the enrichment of society. [FN31] While I understand the hesitation that some folks feel about the idea that educational uses are "transformative" in the colloquial or popular sense - teachers rarely "remix" or "collage" materials like Jeff Koons or Dangermouse or whomever - surely educational uses are very often going to be transformative in the way that Judge Leval describes, and that judges now apply it. Material employed by a teacher in the course of distance learning courses is surely "used as raw material, transformed in the creation of new information, new aesthetics, new insights and understandings." R. Anthony Reese has looked at the cases and verified that "transformative" use does not require the creation of a new work; rather the key is a new purpose or context for the use. For more on this issue, you might be interested in Peter Jaszi's forthcoming short article on fair use and education in light of the courts' general turn to transformativeness as the dominant way of thinking about fair use. Best, B Brandon Butler | Director of Public Policy Initiatives | Association of Research Libraries | brandon@xxxxxxx | http://policynotes.arl.org | @ARLpolicy | w: 202.296.2296 x156 | m: 202.684.6030 | 21 Dupont Circle NW, Washington, D.C., 20036
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Copyright, for-profit education, Christine Wilson | Thread | CIP 2012 Biennial Symposium—Early B, Center for Intellect |
Re: Copyright, for-profit education, Christine Wilson | Date | CIP 2012 Biennial Symposium—Early B, Center for Intellect |
Month |