Subject: Re: R: [stella] PCMSG 2.5 (Oystron? From: Greg Miller <gmiller@xxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 15:38:36 -0500 |
Piero Cavina wrote: > Now it seems stranger to me why the 2600 has no video memory at all. I > thought it was because at the time it was too expensive... Well, I guess it depends on what you consider too expensive... What were the original retail prices of the 2600 and O2? And there might have been some other part of the 2600 whose cost they had to make up for. -- Video games and CCGS: http://www.angelfire.com/tn/squirrels Tradewars (online game): http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Bay/1367 CAUCE, anti-spam legislation info: http://www.cauce.org ***** ATTENTION NEWBIES: Limit signatures to four lines! ***** -- Archives updated once/day at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/ Unsubscribing and other info at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/stella.html
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: R: [stella] PCMSG 2.5 (Oystron?, Robin Harbron | Thread | [stella] costs, Glenn Saunders |
RE: [stella] O2 vs 2600 hardware, Dan Boris | Date | Re: [stella] Whodunit?, Edward Federmeyer |
Month |