Subject: RE: [stella] A new version of an old assembler. From: Bob Colbert <retroware@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 09 Jul 1998 07:33:18 -0500 |
At 06:00 PM 7/8/98 -0700, you wrote: >I think all you would >need to do to Distella is to remove the leading dots from the undocumented >opcodes in table.c. But I haven't tried it. Any volunteers to get Distella >to disassemble the undocumented opcodes? Well, there is a little more to it than that, you need to indicate the address mode in the table for the opcode too, which is fairly easy. I do need to update Distella because I found an opcode that didn't disassemble correctly (I wrote it down on one of the numerous pieces of paper adorning my desk). I have also thought of a couple of algorithms to help in determining the difference between data and code that could be added... I don't know how much time I'll have in the next month or so since my wife is due in 9 days :) I'll try and look at it tonight! (But don't hold your breath :) >Of course Bob is still more than welcome to include this file in the >official release of DASM. Well, I would be happy to put the modified version on my webpage. I got the v2.12 (I think that is is) to compile under MS VC++ 5.0, but it is only the 32-bit DOS version (Eckhard! Are you up for another compilation?). When I e-mailed Matt about putting the altered code on my page, he was more than happy let me (though it took about 2 or 3 months to get a reply). I can also send him a new e-mail and see if he will simply release the program into the public domain. Later, Bob -- Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/ Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/stella.html
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [stella] A new version of an ol, John Saeger | Thread | RE: [stella] A new version of an ol, Eckhard Stolberg |
Re: [stella] Is the list dead? I ha, kickass | Date | RE: [stella] A new version of an ol, Eckhard Stolberg |
Month |