Re: [stella] Stella at 20

Subject: Re: [stella] Stella at 20
From: "nj bloodline" <njbl00dline@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2001 01:24:52 -0400
Nah, all DiVx has to resynch... and it just turns out new DiVx beta codec is
worse.. just about everyone I know who used it went back to 3.11 version. 4
crashes a lot too.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Rob" <kudla@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <stella@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <stella@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 12:17 AM
Subject: Re: [stella] Stella at 20


> At 12:03 AM 7/28/01 -0400, nj bloodline wrote:
> >Well, when you play DiVx and forward or rewind the video, there's a 2-3
> >second period when it needs to catchup, so it  plays really fast usually
> >with no sound.. while it synchs (with DiVx 3.11 codec). With the new DiVx
4
>
> This depends on the keyframe setting when you encode.  As you note, VCD
> MPEG-1 does a keyframe like every 10 frames so the delay is imperceptible.
> You can set DivX;-) to insert a keyframe every second and the delay goes
> away, at the expense of the files being bigger.  (You can make MPEG-1
> videos with a "keyframe every frame" but it will look worse due to having
> to fit more data into the same bitrate.)
>
> Rob
>
>
> -
> Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/
> Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/
>

-
Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/
Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/

Current Thread