Roger Williams wrote:
> > I guess, the rounding error could be further reduced by
> > using 16 bit value tables (for LOG only of course :-) Correct?
>
> Yes, the larger the log table the more accurate the results
> will be (but they will never be quite perfect). Remember a
> full 16-bit log table would be 64K...
Sure, 64K is far to much data. I only meant LOG-tables with 256 (i.E.) ~11-bit (make it 16 for easier handling) values, so the results of add and sub would become more accurate, and then put the results into a larger EXP-table with (i.E.) 1024 8-bit values.
That way, the maths should become quite accurate.
Have fun!
Thomas
_______________________________________________________
Thomas Jentzsch | *** Every bit is sacred ! ***
tjentzsch at web dot de |
_______________________________________________________________________
1.000.000 DM gewinnen - kostenlos tippen - http://millionenklick.web.de
IhrName@xxxxxx, 8MB Speicher, Verschluesselung - http://freemail.web.de
-
Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/
Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/
