Subject: RE: [stella] why -68? From: Nicolás Olhaberry <nolh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 4 Jan 1980 15:04:53 -0300 |
----- Original Message ----- From: Nicolás Olhaberry <nolh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <stella@xxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 8:29 AM Subject: RE: [stella] why -68? > colorclock 66 instead of the documented 68. If this is correct. when I > position an object (having it´s delay in consideration) to be displayed in > colorclock 66, or , let say, 159 (since I´m not too sure about moving Ooops, where it says 159 it should be 227, I meant positioning an object in the rightmost part of the screen, so a part of it will be displayed in the left. Bye, Nicolás. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/ Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [stella] why -68?, Eckhard Stolberg | Thread | Re: [stella] the new artillery game, Manuel Polik |
Re: [stella] why -68?, Eckhard Stolberg | Date | [stella] Gunfight Release Candidate, Manuel Polik |
Month |