Subject: Re: [stella] VCSC.H version 1.0 From: AutismUK@xxxxxxx Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 08:17:32 EST |
In a message dated 28/11/01 2:31:49 GMT Standard Time, ecwilkso@xxxxxxx writes: << On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Glenn Saunders wrote: > Also, has anyone tried using TASM? It looks like it compares fairly well > with DASM, but with the advantage of being usable for Z80 and 6809 code > also. TASM also has a way to define new opcode support in your asm files > (i.e. illegal opcodes). I've heard really good things about TASM, though I haven't used it personally. Seems like someone here uses it. Anyone? (we know who you are, and we have the rabbit!) >> Yep, it's very nice, though its macro facility is a bit limited. I've used it to produce new assemblers for the 1802 and SCMP CPUs and one or two bytecode machines. The new opcode support is a bit so-so. You have to fudge some things, if it doesn't fit one of the standards the current assemblers have. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/ Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [stella] VCSC.H version 1.0, Thomas Jentzsch | Thread | [stella] TASM, Glenn Saunders |
Re: [stella] Farewell, StellaList, Joel Park | Date | Re: [stella] Poker solitaire source, B. Watson |
Month |