Subject: Re: [stella] Is Stella GPL'd? (was StellaX PAL detection) From: Thomas Jentzsch <tjentzsch@xxxxxx> Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 09:20:53 +0100 |
Eckhard wrote: > That might be the case, but I'm not sure if it really is good > news for Manuel. If Stella is GPL, then his idea of protecting > his games by compiling the binaries into the emulator wouldn't > work, as he would have to provide the source code to anyone > who wants it. And if he had to provide the source code for his > games, that would be an even worse situation for him than it > seems to be now. ;-) Do you agree now Manuel? Copy protection inside the source code IS the better (easier) way! ;-) Have fun! Thomas _______________________________________________________ Thomas Jentzsch | *** Every bit is sacred ! *** tjentzsch at web dot de | ____________________________________________________ Berufsunfähigskeitversicherung von Mamax bei WEB.DE. Jetzt informieren! http://bu.web.de ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/ Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [stella] Is Stella GPL'd? (was, John Saeger | Thread | Aw: Re: [stella] Is Stella GPL'd? , cybergoth |
Re: [stella] Is Stella GPL'd? (was, Bradford W. Mott | Date | Re: [stella] copy protect idea, Thomas Jentzsch |
Month |