Subject: Re: [stella] Fu Kung! v0.04 From: Adam Thornton <adam@xxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 10:27:01 -0600 |
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 09:34:37AM -0600, Albert Yarusso - AtariAge wrote: > Quick response here, as I don't have time to test this latest binary yet.. > :) > > > Eckhard mentioned how to adjust my binary for Cuttle-Cart compatibility. > > How many people would actually use a Cuttle-Cart compatible version to > test > > on hardware? I need to know if its worthwhile taking the time to make > sure > > the binary is Cuttle-Cart compatible. > > I would run binaries on the Cuttle Cart. Being able to test on the Cuttle > Cart allows me to very easily try each version you release on a real > television. The only alternative would be to burn this to an EPROM and test > it that way. On the other hand, a homebrew project I would pay REAL MONEY for (unlike a cart dumper) would be a new release of the Cuttle Cart; my Supercharger just doesn't cut it for 32K monster carts, somehow. Even better, of course, would be a redesigned 2600-on-an-FPGA, which just happened to have a serial interface and plenty of RAM masquerading as ROM, and enough logic to implement the various bankswitching modes, so that in addition to my carts, I could play ROMs by easily downloading them to the box. Hint, hint. Adam ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/ Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [stella] Fu Kung! v0.04, Albert Yarusso - Ata | Thread | Re: [stella] Fu Kung! v0.04, Glenn Saunders |
Re: [stella] Collaboration, Thomas Jentzsch | Date | [stella] Chip Select Line, Kroko |
Month |