Subject: Re: [stella] 10-in-1 Toymax From: Adam Thornton <adam@xxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 09:57:45 -0600 |
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 11:22:20PM +1100, Andrew Davie wrote: > I have independantly come across information about this machine. It is > running a 65816, and games are not binary-compatible. Neither is the > hardware anything like the '2600. In fact, the machine doesn't have > raster-change capabilities, so the conversion process would have been a > major pain in the butt. The games it does run are probably due to the > brilliance of the guys doing the 'conversions' which are more like > recompilations/rewrites. Impressive, but you have to wonder if at the same price point, a 6502 and a reengineered TIA wouldn't have been a *whole* lot easier. Adam ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/ Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [stella] 10-in-1 Toymax, Andrew Davie | Thread | Re: [stella] 10-in-1 Toymax, Glenn Saunders |
Re: [stella] 10-in-1 Toymax, Andrew Davie | Date | Re: Illegal opcodes (was Re: [stell, Dennis Debro |
Month |