> It's a flicker fest however (I'm sure you knew that) and the frames are so
> interlaced, that the animations arent getting the same amount of animation
> they were before... :-) And the bottom poor babys at the bottom lose 1/4
of
> their head in part of the animation :-)
It was just a quick systems test, so
a) Frames are in random order - hence it looks like the animation is missing
frames
b) Frames are 5 x 6 instead of 6 x 6 - hence the top of the baby's head
disappears in a few.
c) Flickers the same as the two baby demo. Just looks bad on emulators.
I just wanted to show a screen FULL of animating stuff.
Cheers
A
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Larkin" <clarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <stella@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 5:13 AM
Subject: Re: [stella] Oh, no no no no!
> Hilarious :-)
>
> It's a flicker fest however (I'm sure you knew that) and the frames are so
> interlaced, that the animations arent getting the same amount of animation
> they were before... :-) And the bottom poor babys at the bottom lose 1/4
of
> their head in part of the animation :-)
>
> But beggers can't be choosers! This is way above my technical know how
> anyway :-)
>
> Fantastic job as usual Andrew...
>
> --Chris
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Andrew Davie" <adavie@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <stella@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 3:58 AM
> Subject: [stella] Oh, no no no no!
>
>
> > Oh, no no no no...
> > Cheers
> > A
> >
> > PS: Z26 -g11
> > Stella .PRO file included
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------
> Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/
> Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/
>
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/
Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/
