> If Cyberstella had come with a manual, I'd now say RTFM. But
> since it didn't, I'll just politely suggest that you get the
> Stella manual for one of the other versions and have a look
> at the section about the STELLA.PRO format. ;-)
It does, and I did. The advertised "Cartridge.Filename" does not work.
It's only when I include the .MD5 that Stella will successfully run my
binary.
>
> If z26 is doing what you want, why are you trying to switch to Stella
> then? If you tell us what you like better about it, we might be able
> to borrow those ideas for the Windows version of z26. Command line
> parameters still work nicely in it. In fact that's the only UI we have
> so far. ;-)
Stella flickers considerably less due to its higher frame-rate. That alone
is incentive for me to consider switching. I'm quite surprised it has a
higher frame rate - but it does - more than twice as fast, I'd say. Mind
you, if Z26 supported the blended frames I suggested a few days ago... I'd
probably stick with it :) PS: OS is XP.
Cheers
A
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/
Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/
