Subject: Re: [stella] DASM 'upgrade' in progress From: "Thomas Jentzsch" <tjentzsch@xxxxxx> Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 11:38:38 +0100 |
Andrew wrote: > comments with cycle times in the output list file (including cumulative > count capability) That would be great, especially if you could also recognize and mark page-penalties (e.g when branching). > adding all the 'illegal' opcodes Yup! You can find the neccessary file from John in this post: http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/200006/msg00064.html > ... any other requests? - it would be nice if DASM would return some errorcodes for batch processing. - maybe the output of the symbol file could be used for something? - the macro processing could need some tweaking too. E.g. - reading values from an adress in the binary - a variable for the number of parameters - manipulations of the parameters to gain more flexibility - ... - optional warnings when a table or a branch crosses a page border Have?fun! Thomas _______________________________________________________ Thomas?Jentzsch?????????|?***?Every?bit?is?sacred?!?*** tjentzsch?at?web?dot?de?| ______________________________________________________________________________ Jetzt 52 verschiedene Briefpapiere für Ihre E-Mails bei WEB.DE FreeMail - http://freemail.web.de/features/?mc=021140 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/ Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [stella] DASM 'upgrade' in prog, Erik Eid | Thread | Re: [stella] DASM 'upgrade' in prog, Andrew Davie |
RE: [stella] DASM 'upgrade' in prog, Dennis Debro | Date | Re: [stella] DASM 'upgrade' in prog, Andrew Davie |
Month |