C. Bond wrote:
> There are a few 6502 articles on the net which give the function and
> timing of miscellaneous undocumented opcodes. Unfortunately, the timings
> given for some opcodes, with indexing, do not seem to account for page
> crossing. According to the CPU model in the hardware manual, an extra
> cycle is almost certainly required in certain cases and some these do
> not agree with the numbers in the articles. Has anyone verified the
> cycle count for undocumented opcodes?
No, I haven't verified these, but I would be very surprised if the general rules
wouldn't be valid for those too. If an index crosses a page boundary there
*must* be an additional cycles added.
And you can check e.g. the z26 source code for the implementation of all
illegal opcodes.
Have?fun!
Thomas
_______________________________________________________
Thomas?Jentzsch?????????|?***?Every?bit?is?sacred?!?***
tjentzsch?at?web?dot?de?|
______________________________________________________________________________
Horoskop, Comics, VIPs, Wetter, Sport und Lotto im WEB.DE Screensaver1.2
Kostenlos downloaden: http://screensaver.web.de/?mc=021110
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/
Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/
