On Sunday, November 9, 2003 at 06:59, Dennis Debro wrote:
> Cool! I wondered what a game like Surround would have looked like if they
> did something like this. Using the ball as fill in instead of having the
> "worm" move 4 pixels would have been a nice touch.
Yes, but IMO it would have been a bit irritating if the worm move
points differ from the turning points.
> I agree with you. The scrolling is nice and smooth but I don't think the
> trade off is worth it.
Agreed. If I can not fix this problem I will have to switch back. :-(
I am currently experimenting with 20 instead of 18 platforms, but even
that doesn't seem to help fixing the problem. If anybody has an idea,
please tell me.
> It makes the game a lot easier IMO.
That's easy to fix: less platforms. :-)
> I'd prefer the earlier method of using the PF. I haven't tried this
> on the VCS but I don't think the scrolling would be too intolerable.
Except for the generator problem, is there any other reason why you
prefer the earlier one?
Have fun!
Thomas
_______________________________________________________
Thomas Jentzsch | *** Every bit is sacred ! ***
tjentzsch at web dot de |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/
Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/
