Manuel wrote:
> Since I'm usually prefering simple solutions, the sheer
> brilliantness of this snippet is probably too hard to
> resist. :-)
>
> It's just perfect:
>
> No scannline count reqired, no stack, no register, the
> carry doesn't matter...
Thanx! :-)
> Wait... shouldn't it rather be
>
> > lda #3
>
> instead of
>
> > lda #4
Yup, #HEIGHT-1 is correct.
So this is better:
lda #4-1
dcp torpedoyPos
adc #2
sta ENAM1
lda #4-1
dcp torpedoyPos+1
adc #2
sta ENAM0
Have?fun!
Thomas
_______________________________________________________
Thomas?Jentzsch?????????|?***?Every?bit?is?sacred?!?***
tjentzsch?at?web?dot?de?|
______________________________________________________________________________
Erdbeben im Iran: Zehntausende Kinder brauchen Hilfe. UNICEF hilft den
Kindern - helfen Sie mit! https://www.unicef.de/spe/spe_03.php
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/
Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/
