Subject: Re: Aw: Re: [stella] Reflex: Source of PAIN! From: "B. Watson" <atari@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 16:14:33 -0400 (EDT) |
On Mon, 5 Apr 2004 cybergoth@xxxxxxxx wrote: > Hi there! > > > Stuff like `byte #%10101010' is accepted, and shouldn't be. > > What's wrong with this? The # means `immediate mode addressing'... there's no addressing mode with a pseudo-op like `byte'. Putting the # there doesn't do anything useful, and it has the non-useful possibility of confusing people who are still learning 6502 assembly... I don't have my Atari 800 emulator handy (am at work), but I'm almost 100% sure that no 6502 assemblers that run on actual 6502-based machines ever supported `byte #' in their syntax. Mostly I used Mac/65 and the Atari Assembler cartridge back then, maybe some other platforms had assemblers that allowed it (C=64?), but I'd be surprised to hear it. -- B. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/ Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Aw: Re: [stella] Reflex: Source of , cybergoth | Thread | Re: Aw: Re: [stella] Reflex: Source, Manuel Rotschkar |
Re: [stella] INV+ yet again - inv40, Manuel Rotschkar | Date | Re: [stella] Master Mind Deluxe - F, Happy_Dude |
Month |