On Sat, 2004-04-17 at 07:28, Stephen Anthony wrote:
> Notice the smiley after I said that. I said that in jest; but what I
> said is still true. There was once only one 2600 emulator for Linux,
> now there's two.
I counted three. Now there are four. I'm not even sure Stella was
first. There were two more or less simultaneous projects happening on
Linux in the mid 1990's. Dan Boris would know something about that.
> So in a way, they are competing, in a similar way
> that KDE and Gnome compete. That is, there are now more choices for
> users, and development in one may spur development in the other. But
> they're still competing :)
Fair enough.
[snip]
> But I'd want to keep the name as KStella, since that's what is was
> called before I started working on it.
[snip]
So what would you call the resulting emulator if you accomplish what you
proposed in a message on Mar 15, 2004 where you said:
"I've come to the conclusion that the only way to do it is port the
relevant sections of z26 to C or C++ and integrate it into Stella."
given that the original emulator was called "z26"?
John
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/
Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/
