Subject: Re: [stella] Stack pointer. Some questions From: happy_dude@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 00:15:22 +1000 |
Eric Ball wrote: > How much RAM you allocate > for the stack typically depends on the depth of subroutine calls in your > code. (Typically no more than a level or two, i.e. 4 bytes). Thats where the problem was. I just re-wrote / re-ordered all my routines and re-claimed 2 bytes of ram :-D Thanks to everyone. I think I understand now. The stack pointer is 1 byte in the processor that points to the stack And the stack is 2 bytes in ram that points to code. So now that I am more knowledgable I will rephrase my question ;-) Is is possible to address the "stack" like other variables ? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/ Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [stella] Stack pointer. Some qu, Eric Ball | Thread | Re: [stella] Stack pointer. Some qu, Christian Bogey |
RE: [stella] Stack pointer. Some qu, Dan Boris | Date | Re: [stella] Stack pointer. Some qu, Christian Bogey |
Month |