-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 21 May 2005, David Galloway wrote:
> Still, it would be useful to have a superoptimizer for 6502 as a handy
> way to create smaller or faster code sequences for small routines. (or
> submit your code to Stella, because that's a pretty damn fine
> distributed superoptimizer already.)
>
> http://big-oh.cs.hamilton.edu/~egouldin/main.html
I have doubts as to whether this would do better than a good peephole
optimizer for the 6502.
The 6502 instruction set is fairly small and orthagonal; there just aren't
that many different ways to do most of the things that people are going to
want to do.
Of course, I'd love to see someone prove me wrong.
- --
adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://cuddlepuddle.org/~adam
KG6GZR http://cuddlepuddle.org/~adam/resume.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCkKTpyvXf5Z0z5zERAv9BAKC7UUwT1t93n0MLP2uXViMDdBM7GwCcCptG
b8LPd7tEfWl4X7+kt+9qtxA=
=AnBd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/
Unsub & more at http://stella.biglist.com
