Subject: [stella] dedicated systems From: Glenn Saunders <mos6507@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 18:59:28 -0400 |
--- Adam Thornton <adam@xxxxxxx> wrote: > In fact, why would Infogrames do it this way, rather > than (as with > the existing 2600-on-a-chip systems) a crappy > NES-on-a-chip and a not- > really-perfect-but-good-enough-for-the-unwashed-masses > port of the > game they cared about? They already are doing it. Haven't you read about Flashback 2 on AtariAge? > Best Buy looking at a 2600 standalone system, you > probably want to > relive your childhood with Space Invaders or > Pitfall! or Breakout, > but if faced with the choice between the (admittedly > terrific) > Skeleton+, or something shiny for your GBA, you're > going to buy the > game that has two decades more of hardware platform > development under > it. You can apply whatever logic you like to show that these things shouldn't sell, but the reality is that the market for them is booming. I don't know what the business deals are, but these and Activision Anthology present a high-profile opportunity for homebrewers to distribute their games as part of the bundle. ____________________________________________________ Yahoo! Sports Rekindle the Rivalries. Sign up for Fantasy Football http://football.fantasysports.yahoo.com Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/ Unsub & more at http://stella.biglist.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [personal] Aw: [stella] Emulato, Dan Boris | Thread | Re: [stella] dedicated systems, Adam Thornton |
Re: [stella] Emulator detection, Adam Thornton | Date | Re: [stella] dedicated systems, Adam Thornton |
Month |