Subject: Re: [stella] Stella conditional breakpoint support RFC From: "Eric Ball" <ericball@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 22:39:44 -0400 |
Hmm, simple ORs could be handled via multiple entries for the same PC. But obviously my idea doesn't handle more complex ops. > My #1 biggest question though, was: should I even try to support > conditions that aren't tied to a PC-based breakpoint or address-based > trap? Your answer implies that I shouldn't ("check PC first..."), so I > guess that counts as one vote against arbitrary conditions...? Hmm, I'm trying to think of a non-watch case which wouldn't / couldn't be PC based. Maybe some SP stuff. But the 6502 is so register constrained that I can't image triggering a breakpoint without some constraints on PC. Even if you were to allow arbitrary breakpoint conditions, I suspect that 90+% of the use would be for very constrained cases anyway. Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/ Unsub & more at http://stella.biglist.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [stella] Stella conditional bre, B. Watson | Thread | Re: [stella] Stella conditional bre, Jeremy Penner |
Re: [stella] Stella conditional bre, Jeremy Penner | Date | Re: [stella] Stella conditional bre, B. Watson |
Month |