You, changed a lot of types. Probably you changed something from signed to
unsigned (or vice-versa) you shouldn't have, but the diff output is huge...
>-- Original-Nachricht --
>From: mathys66@xxxxxxxxxx
>To: stella@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: RE: [stella] DASM update -- 2.20.10b
>Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 14:40:05 -0400
>Reply-To: stella@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>>PS: I have been made aware of an error introduced into 2.20.10 -- lda #-1
>>
>>and similar will not compile. Use instead lda #<-1. If someone could
find
>>
>>this bug for me, I'd be delighted. It's to do with the assembler using
>a
>>
>>16-bit value where only 8 is allowed. I touched it, I broke it. You would
>>
>>think a 'diff' on the code would make the problem obvious, but I can't
see
>>
>>it :(
>>
>
>Hello,
>which versions are you comparing against eachother ? 2.20.10 and 2.20.07
>?
>btw : have you ever thought about creating a sourceforge project for dasm
>? having a version history available to the public could help here...
>regards
>thomas
>
>Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/
>Unsub & more at http://stella.biglist.com
>
Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/
Unsub & more at http://stella.biglist.com
