Subject: Re: More XSL Discussion From: Paul Prescod <papresco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 02 Mar 1998 18:22:30 -0500 |
Rob McDougall wrote: > > Of course, once one has separated them out, one has to ask oneself if > the second step is really needed? Couldn't the transformation be used > to insert "Inline Styles"? :) I think that this is the correct argument against a two-step transform. It is worth noting that DSSSL's first-step is optional, not implemented by Jade, and not relied upon by any of the stylesheets I am aware of. In other words, it is optional in every relevant sense. It would be strange if the DSSSL "subset" for the web made it mandatory. Paul Prescod - http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco [Woody Allen on Hollywood in "Annie Hall"] Annie: "It's so clean down here." Woody: "That's because they don't throw their garbage away. They make it into television shows." XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: More XSL Discussion, Rob McDougall | Thread | Style vs. transformation, Richard Light |
RE: More XSL Discussion, Rob McDougall | Date | Style vs. transformation, Richard Light |
Month |