Subject: RE: Style vs. transformation From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 03 Mar 1998 14:44:37 -0800 |
At 17:22 98/03/03 -0500, Rob McDougall wrote: >You say that "style language is already essentially a transformation". >I disagree. There are two separate mechanisms going on here. I believe Paul is referring to the use of JADE's custom flow objects (for emitting SGML or XSL syntax) that can be specified in a DSSSL style specification to transform an SGML or XSL instance into another instance perhaps conforming to a different DTD than the original. This is *very* powerful and *very* useful as it stands today. ........... Ken -- G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com Box 266, V: +1(613)489-0999 Kars, Ontario CANADA K0A-2E0 F: +1(613)489-0995 PGP Privacy: http://www.cyberus.ca/~holman/gkholman.pgp Training: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/schedule.htm XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Style vs. transformation, Paul Prescod | Thread | Re: Style vs. transformation, Sean Mc Grath |
RE: Style vs. transformation, Rob McDougall | Date | Re: Style vs. transformation, Paul Prescod |
Month |