Subject: Re: FW: XSL - Loss to braille style sheets? From: James Clark <jjc@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 02 Sep 1998 17:43:51 +0700 |
Pawson, David wrote: > > This is an extract from a post to the protocols and formats group > of the Web Accessibility Initiative. > Another reason to ensure some form of procedural language > is kept - Internationalisation this time, rather than the braille > using minority, or don't they count either. I don't think using a procedural language is the right way to specify hyphenation in a stylesheet, and I don't read Martin's message as suggesting that. Equally, I find it hard to believe that a procedural language is the right way to describe Braille contractions. It seems to me to be something that would be relatively easy to specify declaratively with properties. If you are willing to write code to do Braille contractions, I don't understand why you need any help from XSL: you could just code up something with Java and the DOM that does the contractions. James XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
FW: XSL - Loss to braille style she, Pawson, David | Thread | Re: FW: XSL - Loss to braille style, Paul Prescod |
Re: XSL WD1.0: Numbering in the sou, James Clark | Date | Re: Just Not Getting It, carlton . e . noles |
Month |