Subject: Re: Processing meta deta (or why XSL 1.0 is broken) From: ht@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Henry S. Thompson) Date: 07 Sep 1998 18:16:08 +0100 |
Andrew Bunner <bunner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > -test.xml- > <?xml version='1.0'?> > <document> > <description>foo</description> > </document> > > -test.xsl- > <?xml version="1.0"?> > <xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-xsl" result-ns=""> <xsl:template match="document"> <meta name="content" description="{description}"/> > </xsl:template> > </xsl:stylsheet> > > -output.html- > <meta name="content" description="foo"> > > I'm using James Clark's xt processor... thoughts, comments and pointers to > resources that can help are all welcome. There are two things to say about the above: 1) It's a flaw which I expect will be corrected that you can't say <xsl:template match="document/description"> <meta name="content" description="{.}"/> </xsl:template> 2) It's a feature :-) that you will get an XML empty element in your output: HTML as it stands is not valid XML. ht XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Processing meta deta (or why XSL 1., Andrew Bunner | Thread | Re: Processing meta deta (or why XS, Scott Vanderbilt |
Processing meta deta (or why XSL 1., Andrew Bunner | Date | Re: Processing meta deta (or why XS, Scott Vanderbilt |
Month |