Subject: RE: writing entity references. From: "Pawson, David" <DPawson@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1999 13:24:09 -0000 |
Paul P wrote: If we really need entity references in the output (doubtful) <snip> James is offering us 'processing' of the output tree, via filter. If we are to consistently manage the transformation of, for example, a full set of European characters, then surely entities are the way to go? If the filter program could get one of any number of inputs, it would be confusing, to say the least, dangerous at worst. Are Paul and I using the same interpretation of 'output'? I.e. the result of using an XSL transformation? regards, DaveP XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: writing entity references., Sebastian Rahtz | Thread | Re: writing entity references., David Carlisle |
Re: writing entity references., Sebastian Rahtz | Date | Re: writing entity references., David Carlisle |
Month |