Subject: RE: Understanding character handling From: "Lawton, Scott" <slawton@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1999 20:43:16 -0500 |
> > The need for this is very real. If we can't write entity references in our > > result document, we're reduced to using all manner of horrible kludges to make > > our viewers see the right thing. Who wants to do... > > ... contortions with nbsp deleted. > Why is this a problem. is just the character  , so why do you > need to write `nbsp'. No machine parsing the result will care which you use. Jumping in: That, of course, is the crux of the problem. Some code that processes the result *will* care -- if not about , certainly about some entities. I'd like to be able to transform XML without validating -- and without declaring entities (or a result namespace). The need for such a transformer is real; whether or not the XSL WG wants XSL to be this transformer is another question. $0.25, Scott (as always, speaking only for myself not the company at which I'm currently contracting) XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Understanding character handlin, David Carlisle | Thread | RE: Understanding character handlin, Markor, John (Non-HP |
Re: Understanding character handlin, David Carlisle | Date | Producing multiple result files, James Tauber |
Month |