Subject: Re: dl/dt/dd matching From: James Clark <jjc@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 10:42:51 +0700 |
Francois Belanger wrote: > I can see here that this is modifying the input tree by creating new > parent nodes to act as a container of each slice. From previous postings > on this list, this seems to cause problems, is it in this case? I don't think an approach based on modifying the input tree is workable. To make something like what you suggest work, I think you would have to change the semantics of select patterns to return lists of lists of nodes instead of simply lists of nodes. I would prefer something simpler. James XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: dl/dt/dd matching, Francois Belanger | Thread | RE: dl/dt/dd matching, Pawson, David |
Re: Standard API to XSL processors, Tyler Baker | Date | Re: Feature Request: OtherNodeExpr:, James Clark |
Month |