Subject: inconsistencies between XSL and XLL From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 22:47:14 -0500 |
Hi, The whole exercice about the stylesheet processing intruction lead me to see a certain inconsistency between XLL and the style sheet PI. In the last recommendation, the PI is stated as <?xml-stylesheet....?> and was in the previous proposal <?xml:stylesheet...?>. XLL links according to the latest posted proposal are expressed as <A xml:link="simple" href="http://www.w3.org/">The W3C</A>. Why do we have to kind of notation a) xml-stylesheet b) xml:link On based on namespaces and the other on ????. Is it because W3 want to distinguish processing instructions from other kind of markups? Is the implicit rule (but not stated anywhere) that xml-something is for processing instructions and xml:something is for other stuff like pointers or other kind of objects? Will W3 publish a paper to clarify this? Thanx in advance for the answers Didier PH Martin mailto:martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.netfolder.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Displaying XML element contents, G. Ken Holman | Thread | Re: inconsistencies between XSL and, Chris Lilley |
Displaying XML element contents wit, hyflam | Date | Re: Displaying XML element contents, G. Ken Holman |
Month |