Subject: Re: Leventhal's challenge misses the point From: "Chuck White" <chuck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 11:31:39 -0700 |
Chuck White Creative Director Advance Recruitment Advertising, Inc. chuck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.advancerecruitment.com any views expressed in this or any other e-mail from this author are strictly the author's and are not representative of Advance Recruitment Advertising, Inc.or any of its clients. Sara Mitchell wrote: >There is one other issue that you're missing here -- will the >non-programmer be as willing to learn JavaScript as XSL? They've completely missed this. And i think the answer is a resounding no. >This is probably dependent on the person and their background, >but there is at least one really big point in favor of XSL >over the programming/scripting laguages (at least in my >opinion). In fact, I've heard it mentioned by programmers in >this list for why XSL is so *hard* -- it relates rather >naturally to how documents are structured. That might not make >it simpler to learn for a graphic designer, but it does for >writers (myself included). Most graphic designers understand what a template is. XSL is intuitive to designers. Scripting is not. > >Sara Mitchell XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Leventhal's challenge misses th, Guy Murphy | Thread | Is there some information about ben, Kyong-ha Lee |
Re: Leventhal's challenge misses th, Larry Fitzpatrick | Date | Re: Leventhal's challenge misses th, Nicolas Pottier |
Month |